The Inefficient Boss: Directing the Threats of Office Politics

 

The Inefficient Boss: Directing the Threats of Office Politics

In some institutions, there is one boss who seems to defy all expectations by remaining in a position of authority despite their inefficiency. These individuals often rely on playing office politics to maintain their status, leaving their subordinates frustrated and the organization's productivity compromised. Such bosses have dynamical faces like chameleon.

Inefficient bosses are those who struggle to perform their job responsibilities effectively. They might lack the necessary skills, experience, or motivation to lead a team efficiently. Yet, they manage to adhere to their positions, with their adeptness at playing office politics. This involves engaging in manipulative tactics, building alliances, spreading lies and using their influence to protect their position within the Institute.

A boss who insists on overseeing every minor detail of a project but consistently fails to meet deadlines or deliver quality results. Despite their poor performance, they maintain their position by forming alliances with some colleagues and diverting blame onto their subordinates.

These bosses excel at taking credit for their team's hard work. They present their subordinates' ideas as their own, bask in the glory of their achievements, and use their political skills to ensure they are not held accountable for failures.

Inefficient bosses often control information flow to manipulate situations to their advantage. They selectively share information, keep subordinates in the dark, and use their knowledge as leverage to secure their position.

This type of boss is known for spreading rumors and gossip to create division within the team. By sowing discord and mistrust, they ensure that their subordinates are too preoccupied with infighting to challenge their leadership.

Why Inefficient Bosses Persist? Several factors contribute to the persistence of inefficient bosses in the Institute:

Political Penetration: Inefficient bosses often possess strong political skills, allowing them to manipulate situations and people to their advantage.

Alliances and Favors: They build alliances with influential people, exchange Favors, and create a support network that shields them from criticism and repercussions.

Relationships Matter: They prioritize building strong relationships with colleagues, even if it means sacrificing work quality. These relationships can serve as a buffer, protecting them from criticism and consequences.

Fear and Pressure: Inefficient bosses’ rule through fear and pressure, making employees hesitant to speak up or challenge their authority.

Lack of Accountability: In the Institutions, there is a lack of accountability, which allows inefficient bosses to escape consequences for their poor performance.

Misleading Authority: These bosses succeed to maintain the status quo by raising unfavourable environment against competent employee.

Stress and Exhaustion: Constantly battling against unfair tactics can lead to high levels of stress and exhaustion for competent employees.

Incompetent bosses who rely on office politics to maintain their positions can be a source of frustration and demotivation for employees. However, by understanding the dynamics at play and taking proactive steps, employee can navigate this challenging situation with resilience and determination. Eventually, institutions should strive strongly to foster a culture of accountability and meritocracy, ensuring that those in leadership positions are genuinely effective and deserving of their roles.

Dr Nikunj Bhatt

drnikunjbhatt@vpscience.org

09825293238